Google Pixel vs Samsung Galaxy: Which Android Flagship Deserves Your Money?

Based on benchmark tests, battery comparisons, 200+ photo shootouts, and real user experiences

The short answer: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra wins for power users who need raw performance, all-day battery life, and zoom photography. The Google Pixel 9 Pro wins for most people who want a cleaner software experience, better value, and the most natural-looking photos. If you're not a heavy gamer or productivity power user, the Pixel delivers 90% of the experience at 30% less cost. Get the Google Pixel 9 Pro on Amazon for $899 →


The Fighters

Google Pixel 9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Price $899 on Amazon $1,049 on Amazon
Best For Clean software, photography purists, value seekers Power users, productivity, zoom photography
Processor Google Tensor G4 Snapdragon 8 Elite
Display 6.3" Super Actua OLED 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Battery 4,700mAh 5,000mAh
RAM 16GB 12GB

Google Pixel 9 Pro official product shot in Obsidian


The Death Match: 6 Rounds, 1 Winner

We're scoring each round from 1-10. Higher score wins the round. Let's fight!


Round 1: Raw Performance

The benchmark numbers don't lie—and they're brutal for Google. The Galaxy S25 Ultra's Snapdragon 8 Elite posts an AnTuTu score of 2,207,809 compared to the Pixel's 1,380,138. In Geekbench 6 multi-core tests, Samsung doubles the Pixel with 9,846 vs 4,854. Graphics performance is even more lopsided—the Galaxy scores 6,687 in 3D Mark Wild Life while the Pixel manages just 2,540.

But here's the thing: both phones feel smooth in daily use. You'll only notice the difference in intensive gaming or video editing. The Tensor G4 was designed for AI tasks, not benchmark bragging rights. Still, raw power is raw power.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
6/10 9/10

Round 1 Winner: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — More than double the multi-core performance and 2.5x better graphics.

Score after Round 1: Pixel 6 | Galaxy 9


Round 2: Camera Quality

Tom's Guide shot over 200 photos comparing these cameras, and the results were closer than expected. Samsung's 200MP main sensor wins on telephoto zoom and macro shots, while the Pixel's computational photography produces more natural, true-to-life colors.

The Pixel consistently avoided Samsung's tendency to oversaturate—some pumpkins in Samsung's shots looked "too day-glo" compared to the Pixel's more accurate rendering. However, Google still holds the crown for selfies with its 42MP front camera producing sharper, wider shots.

For low-light photography, it's a toss-up. Samsung's hardware advantage helps in extreme darkness, but Google's Night Sight processing often produces cleaner results with less noise. Both phones take excellent photos—the difference is whether you prefer Samsung's punchy processing or Pixel's natural look.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
9/10 8/10

Round 2 Winner: Google Pixel 9 Pro — More accurate colors, better selfies, and Google's AI processing is genuinely magic.

Score after Round 2: Pixel 15 | Galaxy 17


Round 3: Battery Life

PhoneArena's battery tests show the Galaxy S25 Ultra lasting 41% longer overall—31 hours 10 minutes vs the Pixel's 22 hours 7 minutes. The most dramatic difference? Gaming: Samsung delivers 14 hours 21 minutes versus the Pixel's 7 hours 21 minutes.

The Galaxy wins three of four battery tests. The Pixel's only consolation is a one-hour advantage in web browsing. Samsung's larger 5,000mAh battery combined with the Snapdragon 8 Elite's efficiency makes this round decisive.

Charging speeds slightly favor Samsung too: 72% in 30 minutes versus 67% for the Pixel. Full charge takes 59 minutes for Samsung versus 78 minutes for Google. The Pixel does offer faster wireless charging at 23W versus Samsung's 15W, but most people charge wired.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
6/10 9/10

Round 3 Winner: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — Nearly double the gaming battery life and faster wired charging.

Score after Round 3: Pixel 21 | Galaxy 26

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra official product shot in Titanium


Round 4: Software Experience

Both phones promise seven years of OS and security updates—that's parity on paper. The real difference is update speed and software philosophy.

Pixels get day-one updates directly from Google. When a security patch drops, Pixel users have it same-day. Samsung typically lags weeks or months while integrating patches into One UI, though they're working to close this gap with One UI 8.5.

The bigger philosophical difference: Pixel software is "simple and predictive" while Samsung's is "packed and tweakable." Users on forums complain about Samsung's bloatware—one Bogleheads user called it "awful." Others love One UI's customization options.

Pixel exclusives like Call Screen, Hold for Me, and superior voice-to-text keep users loyal. As one switcher noted: "After going to Pixel, I can't go back to Samsung." Note: Call Screen is US-only.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
9/10 7/10

Round 4 Winner: Google Pixel 9 Pro — Cleaner software, faster updates, and Google AI features that actually work.

Score after Round 4: Pixel 30 | Galaxy 33


Round 5: Build Quality & Design

Samsung went premium with a titanium frame and Gorilla Armor 2 glass on both sides. The Pixel uses aluminum rails and Gorilla Glass Victus 2—still excellent, but technically inferior materials. Both carry IP68 water resistance.

However, Samsung's premium build comes with complaints. At 218 grams, users describe the S25 Ultra as "bulky, cumbersome, not enjoyable to hold". The flat sides and sharp edges create an uncomfortable grip. One user said it "feels like an actual brick."

The Pixel 9 Pro at 199 grams is noticeably lighter. But it's not without issues—some units have experienced camera bar lifting and display problems, prompting Google to offer free repairs.

Samsung's camera rings are simply glued on, with reports of them falling off within three months. Both phones have quality control concerns, but Samsung's premium materials edge it out.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
7/10 8/10

Round 5 Winner: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — Titanium beats aluminum, even if the ergonomics suffer.

Score after Round 5: Pixel 37 | Galaxy 41


Round 6: Value for Money

The Pixel 9 Pro costs $899 for 128GB. The Galaxy S25 Ultra starts at $1,299 for 256GB, though current clearance pricing (ahead of the S26 launch) brings it down to around $1,049. Even at sale prices, that's a $150-$400 premium depending on timing.

For that premium, Samsung gives you double the benchmark performance, better battery life, an S Pen, and a titanium frame. But the Pixel gives you arguably better photos for everyday shooting, cleaner software, and Google's AI features.

GSMArena notes the Pixel costs "approximately 30% less" while delivering a comparable experience for most users. The performance gap only matters if you're pushing the hardware with games or productivity apps.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
9/10 7/10

Round 6 Winner: Google Pixel 9 Pro — 30% cheaper while delivering 90% of the experience for most users.

Person using smartphone outdoors


Final Score

Product Total Score Verdict
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 48/60 WINNER
Google Pixel 9 Pro 46/60

The Winner: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

The Galaxy S25 Ultra takes this Death Match by a narrow margin—but the victory comes with asterisks. Samsung dominates in raw performance, battery life, and build materials. If you game on your phone, need all-day battery for power use, or want the best zoom camera, the S25 Ultra is objectively superior.

But "superior" isn't always "better for you." The Pixel 9 Pro won Camera Quality, Software Experience, and Value—the categories that matter most to typical smartphone users. Most people don't benchmark their phones or game for 14 hours straight. They take photos, check email, and want software that doesn't fight them.

The S25 Ultra's performance advantage is real but rarely relevant. Its battery advantage is significant. Its price premium is substantial. For power users who will actually leverage the hardware, the Galaxy is worth every penny. For everyone else, the Pixel delivers a better daily experience at a better price.

Ready to buy the winner? Get the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra on Amazon for $1,049 →


When the Loser Actually Wins

The Google Pixel 9 Pro isn't right for everyone, but it's the better choice if:

  • You prioritize clean, bloat-free software over customization options
  • You want photos that look natural rather than oversaturated
  • You value day-one security updates and Google's AI features
  • You don't game heavily on your phone or need extreme performance
  • You prefer a lighter phone that's easier to hold one-handed
  • You want to save $150-$400 for a nearly equivalent daily experience

The Pixel 9 Pro might be right for you: Check price on Amazon for $899 →


Frequently Asked Questions

Modern smartphones on desk workspace

Which phone has better video recording?

Samsung's Galaxy S25 Ultra edges out the Pixel in video quality, particularly in stabilization and low-light video. However, the Pixel's Audio Magic Eraser for removing unwanted sounds is genuinely useful for casual video creators.

Do both phones support 5G?

Yes, both the Pixel 9 Pro and Galaxy S25 Ultra support 5G connectivity across all major bands. Network performance is comparable between the two.

Which phone is better for business use?

The Galaxy S25 Ultra with its built-in S Pen offers advantages for note-taking and document annotation. Samsung DeX also provides a desktop-like experience when connected to a monitor. The Pixel lacks these productivity features but offers cleaner integration with Google Workspace apps.

How long will these phones receive updates?

Both phones receive 7 years of OS and security updates. The Pixel 9 Pro was released in August 2024, so updates continue through 2031. The Galaxy S25 Ultra launched in February 2025, with support through 2032.


Sources